送交者: dafeng 于 2005-12-27, 22:25:26:

回答: 致《纽约时报》的信（草稿） 由 方舟子 于 2005-12-27, 19:32:28:

Rule by Law: Seeking a Public Voice on China's 'Angry River' by Jim Yardley (December 26, 2005) is a biased and inaccurate report. As a loyal reader of the Times, I have been often citing the Times as the standard of good journalism. However, this time I am very disappointed with the inaccuracy and misinformation in Mr. Yardley's report. Actually, in my email answering to Mr. Yardley's questions (see the enclosure), I corrected such inaccuracy and misinformation, and provided him with some facts which can be easily checked and verified. Unfortunately, Mr. Yardley overlooked, if not intentionally omitted, my opinions and reported only one side story told by the “environmentalists"

• "have been often citing" is not native-like - alvarado (176 bytes) 2005-12-27, 22:32:14
  • i'm talking about repetition of the phrase - alvarado (47 bytes) 2005-12-28, 15:24:51
  • standard 经常被cited. "inaccuracy and misinformation"用法也常见 - 方舟子 (41 bytes) 2005-12-28, 04:51:42
• 我觉得第一句话一定要旗帜鲜明地亮剑，否则就没人看了。 - dafeng (0 bytes) 2005-12-27, 22:29:53
  • 非常有道理。最后看老方定夺 - xj (0 bytes) 2005-12-27, 22:31:34

加跟贴