送交者: 炎阳 于 2005-11-21, 09:57:18:

据说10年间他共做了60例，发表文章时只报告了40例。我估计就这40例的疗效数据他也可能严重造假，此人是工农兵学员，从网上他的言行看，非常油滑，学术根底浅薄，什么黑事都干得出来。我怀疑他那“神来之笔的肖氏XX术”彻头彻尾是个造假案，值得深查。

• 看我算的对不对？ - Enlighten (328 bytes) 2005-11-21, 11:39:28
  • it seems that some enemies of Xiao had organized those disgruntled - 秦州刺史 (337 bytes) 2005-11-21, 12:47:12
  • Xiao is faking data, 862-55=7, how can he claim successful rate is 55/62. - 秦州刺史 (0 bytes) 2005-11-21, 12:32:32
    • I mean "8 is greater than (62-55) =7 already." - 秦州刺史 (0 bytes) 2005-11-21, 12:34:19
      • 62 and 8 might not be in the same period. - Enlighten (92 bytes) 2005-11-21, 14:23:48
        • read patient's letter again, those "8" are in one batch, they all - 秦州刺史 (137 bytes) 2005-11-21, 14:52:59
      • hmm, I didn't see this. I thought eight is 62-55. :-) - xj (0 bytes) 2005-11-21, 12:42:46
        • test - nan (0 bytes) 2005-11-21, 13:06:11
  • 不对。这８例不是随机的。 - xj (18 bytes) 2005-11-21, 11:53:37
• 此人在美国学习过，还是海龟呢？什么逻辑-- - catfish (109 bytes) 2005-11-21, 11:13:52
• 新到中的病人证词不算数的 - xj (68 bytes) 2005-11-21, 10:46:11
• 不造假是不可想象地，造假是天经地义。在中国，混成 - 三弦 (36 bytes) 2005-11-21, 10:37:30

加跟贴