民科加精神病患。专门在中文网站上发表诸如"大多数人都没有真正搞懂爱因斯坦的等效原理","周培源的理解才是正确的"，"霍金彭罗斯没有搞懂广义相对论"之类的"论文"。受到很多"不公正的打压"。

喜欢参加会议，然后到网上吹他在会上驳倒了Professor XXX, YYY, ....最注明的是写公开信给杨振宁要杨承认"学术错误"，哈哈。

这封信里，他也不离本职，提到了"杨振宁受方励之误导","错误地批判周培源。"

他有网站，无聊的话可以捏着鼻子看看：
http://www.cqfyl.com/cylo.htm

他在中国有一些粉丝，但显然他也分不清那些作弄他的假粉丝。

看看他这短短的信里英文之基本错误：

Dear T. M.:

Thank you very much for forwarding the articles on the late Professor L. Z. Fang in memorial of him. I am very ignorant on politics. So, I cannot really comment on his activities on politics. However, as many oversea Chinese, I come to know that he is known for his advocating of academic freedom and democracy. However, as a scientist, I cannot say things that are really positive on his work in science.

I first knew about Professor Fang through an article of my classmate Professor Au, who has coauthored the article with Fang [1]. This article clearly showed Fang's deficiency in general relativity and physics [2]. I met L. Z. Fang in 1991 in Japan. Professor L. Z. Fang impressed me as a very good speaker for a general public, but I was puzzled for his lack of depth as a scholar in private conversations.

Academically as many theorists in cosmology, Professor L. Z. Fang followed the views of the Wheeler School and the work of Hawking & Penrose, both of which have been proven incorrect. In fact, I have personally asked him again later in 2007 about general relativity, and discovered that he still does not understand general relativity. His earlier book coauthored with Ruffini on general relativity confirms this clearly. He did get a reward for an article from a foundation on gravity that always keeps the names of judges for the awards undisclosed; and this is also a foundation that advocated the erroneous views of the Wheeler School.

In particular, he misunderstood Einstein's equivalence principle, and the work of Professor Zhou Pei-Yuan on general relativity. His view made me misunderstood the work of Zhou for a long time. Fang’s view probably also has an impact on the error of C. N. Yang, who incorrectly considered Zhou was wrong in general relativity. Based on what I know, I concluded that Professor Fang’s academic achievements are greatly inflated because his essentially follows the popular errors. I doubt whether he had anything that can be considered as significant in science in the future.

I am sorry that I may have disappointed you.
────────────────────────────────────────