送交者: Enlighten 于 2006-4-27, 11:22:52:

回答: "prove 3+4 is worse than 4+3" simple time discount is fine, 由 mangolasi 于 2006-4-27, 11:14:41:

better-known rule, you will get the point acrossed better.

• isn't dynamic programing a simple well-known approach? - steven (0 bytes) 2006-4-27, 11:56:55
  • I can assure you that this programming terminology is misleading and stupid - xj (63 bytes) 2006-4-27, 12:25:19
    • it was way before computer time, it was after linear programming. - steven (0 bytes) 2006-4-27, 12:59:31
    • Blame the rocket scientists (literally). - mangolasi (0 bytes) 2006-4-27, 12:43:27
      • Richard Bellman was an mathematician. - steven (0 bytes) 2006-4-27, 13:01:35
        • An applied one. And I have the impression that DP is developed - mangolasi (57 bytes) 2006-4-27, 13:06:21
          • And the word "stochastic control" is still prevailing for SDP. - mangolasi (0 bytes) 2006-4-27, 13:07:12
            • I mean, the most important part of SDP. - mangolasi (0 bytes) 2006-4-27, 13:07:42
              • whatever it is, 99% people don't know anything about linear programming - xj (26 bytes) 2006-4-27, 13:10:00
                • The concept is very simple. - mangolasi (68 bytes) 2006-4-27, 13:11:58
                  • 普通人基本上不关心概念，但我同意方没有写好这一篇 - xj (756 bytes) 2006-4-27, 13:35:29
                    • Dissent. - mangolasi (2145 bytes) 2006-4-27, 14:29:06
                      • we two are talking about different things - xj (683 bytes) 2006-4-28, 00:15:45
                    • You are wrong on two things. - Enlighten (360 bytes) 2006-4-27, 13:50:58
                      • 你中文写作不过关。好的故事就是旧典故翻新意 - xj (912 bytes) 2006-4-27, 14:24:36
  • not for general public. time discount is much better known. - Enlighten (63 bytes) 2006-4-27, 12:10:38
    • Philosophically, time discount in utility and time discount in interest - mangolasi (545 bytes) 2006-4-27, 12:21:19
• Making things simple is the most difficult thing to do. - mangolasi (0 bytes) 2006-4-27, 11:26:38

加跟贴